Wednesday, January 19, 2005
CBS vs. Armstrong Williams
Have you noticed the news lately? I'm trying to figure out how it is that the story about CBS has somehow trumped the story about Armstrong Williams.Let's see.... mmmm.... which was is a more important story?
A. Some CBS executives relied on unreliable sources and then stonewalled when asked where they got their information. (on the grand scale of things I think Robert Novak outing a CIA operative who's husband was critical of the Bush administration.... an act that is TREASON... should be investigated more heavily than CBS, but maybe I'm taking crazy pills.) or;
B. The Bush Administration paid a commentator/journalist with YOUR TAX DOLLARS to push their political agenda? (and they accuse Micheal Moore of propaganda!)
And have you noticed how there is not a single story on Fox News about Armstrong Williams but the "Fair and Balanced" station features the CBS story as one of it's main headlines?
Man! The hypocrisy!
A. Some CBS executives relied on unreliable sources and then stonewalled when asked where they got their information. (on the grand scale of things I think Robert Novak outing a CIA operative who's husband was critical of the Bush administration.... an act that is TREASON... should be investigated more heavily than CBS, but maybe I'm taking crazy pills.) or;
B. The Bush Administration paid a commentator/journalist with YOUR TAX DOLLARS to push their political agenda? (and they accuse Micheal Moore of propaganda!)
And have you noticed how there is not a single story on Fox News about Armstrong Williams but the "Fair and Balanced" station features the CBS story as one of it's main headlines?
Man! The hypocrisy!