Friday, September 09, 2005


Bush Hides New Orleans Dead; Just as he hides the Dead in Iraq.

Journalist Groups Protest FEMA Ban on Photos of Dead

Editor & Publisher

NEW YORK - Forced to defend what some critics consider its slow response to the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina, the Federal Emergency Management Agency said on Tuesday it does not want the news media to take photographs of the dead as they are recovered from New Orleans.

FEMA, which is leading the rescue efforts, rejected requests from journalists to accompany rescue boats as they went out to search for storm victims, Reuters reported.

A FEMA spokeswoman told the wire service that space was needed on the rescue boats and assured Reuters that "the recovery of the victims is being treated with dignity and the utmost respect."

"We have requested that no photographs of the deceased be made by the media," the spokeswoman told Reuters via e-mail.

On Wednesday, journalist groups protested the move.

"It's impossible for me to imagine how you report a story whose subject is death without allowing the public to see images of the subject of the story," Larry Siems of the PEN American Center told Reuters.

Rebecca Daugherty of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press said: "The notion that, when there's very little information from FEMA, that they would even spend the time to be concerned about whether the reporting effort is up to its standards of taste is simply mind-boggling. You cannot report on the disaster and give the public a realistic idea of how horrible it is if you don't see that there are bodies as well."

FEMA's policy of excluding media from recovery expeditions in New Orleans is "an invitation to chaos," Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, a part of Columbia University's journalism school, told Reuters.

"This is about managing images and not public taste or human dignity," Rosenstiel said. He said FEMA's refusal to take journalists along on recovery missions meant that media workers would go on their own.

Rosenstiel also noted that U.S. media, especially U.S. television outlets, are generally reluctant to show corpses.

"By and large, American television is the most sanitized television in the world," he said. "They are less likely to show bodies, they are less likely to show graphic images of the dead than any television in the world."

There is also a question of what the American PEN Center's Siems called "international equity," noting that American news outlets cover stories around the world showing the effects of natural disasters and wars in graphic detail.

But Mark Tapscott, a former editor at the Washington Times newspaper who now deals with media issues at the Heritage Foundation, said the FEMA decision did not amount to censorship. (Editor's Note: The Heritage Foundation is a Right Wing Think Tank full of hacks.)

"Let's not make a common decency issue into a censorship issue," Tapscott told Reuters. "Nobody wants to wake up in the morning and see their dead uncle on the front page. That's just common decency."

Editor's Note: Tapscott is full of crap. Censorship is govenment telling the Free Press what not to publish. This from the same asshole who tells us that the "Marketplace" should determine everything, unless it's damaging to the Bush Administration. The media could easily hide actual identities when publishing pictures. The truth is that the Bush Administration is in Damage Control mode, and they know that actual evidence of death will hurt their beloved furer Bushie.

In case you right wingers forgot: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

And you wonder why we call you Nazi's.

The Reuters piece failed to include the second part of my quote in which I said that some big stories require showning dead bodies in order to convey fully the magnitude of the event. The issue then is not if to show the bodies but whether it will be done sensationally or with dignity and respect.
By the way, where exactly did you see me saying anything remotely like what you attribute to me with this sentence: "This from the same asshole who tells us that the 'Marketplace' should determine everything, unless it's damaging to the Bush Administration."
Since you and I both know I've never said anything like that, your simple apology and correction will be sufficient.
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?