Tuesday, June 06, 2006


Anne Coulter says 9/11 Widows "Enjoyed Their Husbands Deaths." Why does the Liberal Media still give her a forum?

You have to wonder why anyone would ever have Ann Coulter on their show. Apparently being a blowhard rightwing fake who's shilling her latest book qualifies you to speak about issues affecting America but being a widow of a 9/11 Victim means you should shut the fuck up.

Ann doesn't even want to discuss WHAT 9/11 Widows are saying, she simply hates them for WHO THEY ARE. Apparently they've gotten some kind of UNDESERVED media attention while poor Annie had to work decades to become the repulsive right-wing shill that she is.

Somebody really should give this poor whiney bitch a cookie.

I really want to ask the media members who put this putrescent hag on their shows why they feel she's qualified to discuss anything on TV when all she's ever done is write a bunch of bile inducing poorly researched hatchet job books? What's the fucking point of having her on your show Matt? Or did you just now figure out she's a pathetic attention-whore?

Here's the transcript:

LAUER: On the 9-11 widows, an in particular a group that had been critical of the administration:

" These self-obsessed women seem genuinely unaware that 9-11 was an attack on our nation and acted like as if the terrorist attack only happened to them. They believe the entire country was required to marinate in their exquisite personal agony. Apparently, denouncing bush was part of the closure process."

And this part is the part I really need to talk to you about:

"These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband’s death so much."

Because they dare to speak out?

COULTER: To speak out using the fact they are widows. This is the left's doctrine of infallibility. If they have a point to make about the 9-11 commission, about how to fight the war on terrorism, how about sending in somebody we are allowed to respond to> No-No-No. We always have to respond to someone who just had a family member die--

LAUER: But aren't they in the middle of the story?...

COULTER: ...Because then if we respond, oh you are questioning their authenticity. No, the story is...

LAUER: So grieve but grieve quietly?

LAUER: What I’m saying is I don’t think they have ever told you, you can't respond.

COULTER: Look, you are getting testy with me.

THE PUNISHER: Ahh poor baby. You need a cookie?

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?