Wednesday, September 12, 2007
Bush Puppet Dave Petraeus. I'm just trying to figure out who has who's hand up who's ass.
Monday, August 27, 2007
Help, I'm stepping into the Twilight Zone, place is a madhouse, feels like being cloned.
8/27/2007 12:44:44 PM President Bush reacted with unusual candor Monday to the resignation of U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
“It is sad that we live in a time when a talented and honorable person like Alberto Gonzales is impeded from doing important work because his good name was dragged through the mud for political reasons,” Bush said at a press conference in Crawford, Texas.
The President praised Gonzales for his “integrity, decency and principle.” He added that in his two and a half years as attorney general, Gonzales “has played a critical role in shaping our policies and the war on terror and has worked tirelessly to make this country safer.”
The two men have shared a close personal and professional relationship since 1995, when as Texas governor Bush requested Gonzales to be his general counsel. Like his professional and personal friendship with Karl Rove, Bush said of Gonzales “In the long course of our work together, this trusted advisor became a close friend.” Bush acknowledged the effects of the controversy surrounding Gonzales, citing “months of unfair treatment” that resulted in “a harmful distraction at the justice department.”
Gonzales is the latest in a series of Bush loyalists forced to resign amid controversial circumstances. The casualties include chief political strategist Karl Rove, White House counselor Dan Bartlett, budget director Rob Portman, chief White House attorney Harriet Miers, political director Sara Taylor, deputy national security advisers J.D. Crouch and Meghan O'Sullivan and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Bush's poll numbers hit record lows in 2007, with his approval rating hovering around 30 percent.
Embattled U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales informed the President of his decision to resign late Sunday, capping a bitter fight with congressional Democrats amid allegations he perjured himself in testimony before Congress on President Bush's domestic wiretapping program.President Bush, who stood by Gonzales through a series of controversies, accepted Gonzales' resignation Friday and is expected to nominate Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff to fill the vacancy left by his longtime friend and legal adviser, according to senior White House officials.
"Yesterday, I met with President Bush and informed him of my decision to conclude my government services as Attorney General of the United States effective September 17," Gonzales said in a brief statement Monday morning.Gonzales, 51, who withstood months-long controversy over the firings of eight federal prosecutors for what critics charged were politically motivated reasons, had resisted calls for his resignation from Democrats and some Republicans, including Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. While Gonzales said he might have mishandled the U.S. attorney firings, the former Texas Supreme Court justice maintained the ousters were in no way politically motivated to influence federal investigations involving lawmakers.
But tensions between Gonzales and Democratic leaders in Congress boiled over after Gonzales testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee and discrepancies emerged between what Gonzales and an intelligence official said about the National Security Agency's then-classified warrantless surveillance program.
In congressional testimony, Gonzales said the purpose of a March 10, 2004 White House briefing was to address "intelligence activities" that were the subject of a legal dispute inside the Bush administration, and not called over the National Security Agency's warrantless surveillance program.
However, a letter sent to Congress in May 2006 by then-Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte described the congressional meeting as a "briefing on the Terrorist Surveillance Program," the name that President Bush has publicly used to refer to the program.
Trying to clear up the misunderstanding with the Senate Judiciary Committee, Gonzales sent a two-page letter to the Committee confirming that there was a dispute between the Justice Department and the White House in March 2004, but conceded he was not clear in his explanations.
"I recognize that the use of the term Terrorist Surveillance Program and my shorthand reference to the 'program' publicly 'described by the president' may have created confusion, particularly for those who are knowledgeable about the N.S.A. activities authorized in the presidential order," Gonzales wrote.
He added that the confusion might have been most intense among those "who may be accustomed to thinking of them or referring to them together as a single N.S.A. program." Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Judiciary committee, said Gonzales' resignation "reinforces what Congress and the American people already know — that no Justice Department should be allowed to become a political arm of the White House, whether occupied by a Republican or a Democrat."
Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., also a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and ardent critic of Gonzales, said the attorney general had done "the right thing" by resigning.
"The Justice Department has been virtually nonfunctional and desperately needs new leadership. Democrats will not obstruct or impede a nominee who we are confident will put the rule of law above political considerations," Schumer said.
Labels: Bush, Delusional, Gonzales
Friday, August 24, 2007
Corruption, Politics and Worker Deaths. Who you vote for could kill you.
Arianna Huffington at Huffpo
Posted August 23, 2007 | 07:09 PM (EST)
Before the hordes of reporters move on from the Crandall Canyon Mine disaster, taking their note pads, satellite trucks, and the nation's attention with them, we should seize the opportunity to turn this tragedy into a teachable moment -- one that will allow us to look beyond the tragedy in Utah and the dreadful safety record of the mining industry, and focus on the larger issue of worker safety.
During the Bush administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the agency meant to oversee workplace safety, has been more intent on providing protection to employers than workers -- eliminating dozens of safety regulations since 2001.
"The people at OSHA have no interest in running a regulatory agency," said Dr. David Michaels, a George Washington University expert on workplace safety. "The concern about protecting workers has gone out the window."
Peg Seminario, director of occupational safety and health at the AFL-CIO, agrees: "They've simply gotten out of the standard-setting business in favor of industry partnerships that have no teeth."
Indeed, over the six and a half years Bush has been president, OSHA has imposed only one major safety rule, and has reduced the categories of recognized workplace injuries. Nevertheless, in 2005, the last year government statistics are available, 4.2 million workers were injured or became ill from on the job causes. And more than 6,800 workers died from workplace injuries.
Yet we rarely hear much about worker safety -- until high-profile deaths like the ones in Utah put the well being of American workers into the media spotlight. Why does it take a tragedy to grab our attention -- and for our government to pass and enforce worker safety laws?
The unsettling reason hangs over the Utah mine cave-in like a cloud of coal dust: as I detailed on Monday, more and more frequently, federal regulatory agencies are being used as a payback mechanism for rewarding major political donors, with industry hacks given key government positions not because they are the best people to protect the public interest but because they are willing to protect the very industries they are meant to supervise.
That's what has happened with OSHA, which is under the leadership of Edwin Foulke, a lawyer with a long history of open hostility to health and safety regulations. Earlier in his career, while serving as chairman of the federal agency that hears appeals from companies cited by OSHA, Foulke led a successful effort to weaken OSHA's enforcement power. With Foulke now in charge of his former target, OSHA has, not surprisingly, issued fewer significant standards than any time in its history.
Foulke's agency is charged with overseeing regulation of the transportation, agribusiness, and constructions industries -- powerful interests that have together contributed more than $630 million since 2000, with over $450 million of that going to the GOP.
Foulke and Richard Stickler, the fox Bush has guarding the mining industry henhouse, might as well have been presented to the GOP's big money backers with a ribbon around their heads, like the proper gift they were.
And in the Bush years you can find such overly cozy relationships between regulators and those they regulate throughout the government.
The Food and Drug Administration, for example, has long been under the thumb of the very pharmaceutical companies it is supposed to oversee. This dysfunctional dynamic has proved especially deadly, with numerous drugs being pulled off the market after causing multiple deaths and serious injuries in patients.
Following the money once again, we see that Big Pharma spent over $170 million on lobbying in 2006, and has contributed over $66 million to federal candidates since 2002, with over $46 million of it going to Republicans.
In return, the Bush administration has served up FDA commissioners like Lester Crawford who was forced to resign after failing to disclose that he owned stock in companies regulated by his agency, and current FDA commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach, a vocal supporter of faster drug approvals.
The Bush administration has also given back to big business interests by taking away: the FDA is conducting only half the food inspections it was doing in 2003, and safety-testing of U.S.-produced food has dropped nearly 75 percent since 2003. This despite an upswing in highly publicized food recalls and outbreaks of food poisoning. And with more and more of our food coming from other countries, how does it make you feel to know that just 1.3 percent of food imports were physically examined by FDA inspectors in 2006?
The bracing truth is that we now have a regulatory system in which corporate greed, political timidity, and a culture of cronyism are the order of the day.
It was announced today that after Labor Day, the Senate will hold hearings on the Utah Mine disaster. And, in the House, Reps. Lynn Woolsey and George Miller have promised a probe into the Utah disaster and its aftermath. Such congressional investigations are essential. But they need to focus on more than what happened at Crandall Canyon Mine - and even on more than just mine safety. They should also focus on exposing all the reasons in our political system that make it so easy for the health and safety of U.S. workers and consumers to be reduced to an afterthought - -moved to the front burner only when tragedy strikes. And then only for a short while.
Labels: Bush, Cronyism, Republican
Sunday, July 29, 2007
Conservative lawyer Bruce Fein argues for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney
Conservative constitutional lawyer Bruce Fein, in an interview with The Chronicle's editorial page editor John Diaz, explains why he believes George W. Bush's foreign policies are making Americans less safe, and why the president and Vice President Dick Cheney should be impeached.
...it's utterly indispensable that the consitution be preserved and protected, because it is the scientific method for arriving at political truth and wisdom and for keeping the country in balance, avoiding the extremes and hubris that comes with unchecked power.Listen: 16:22 min
(Download Audio 7.86 MB)
Fein is currently the chairman of the American Freedom Agenda and formerly was associate deputy attorney general under the Reagan administration.
Look for his op-ed piece in the Sunday edition of the San Francisco Chronicle and on SFGate.